<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Drone Strikes</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.icrac.net/tag/dronestrikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.icrac.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>AP report: 30% of Pakistan drone strike dead not &#8220;militants&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.icrac.net/ap-report-30-of-pakistan-drone-strike-dead-not-militants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Chair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone Strikes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icrac.net/?p=36</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Associated Press reports  that an &#8220;on-the-ground investigation&#8221; it conducted in North Waziristan of &#8220;10 of the deadliest [drone] attacks in the past 18 months&#8221;  found that  &#8220;of at least 194 people killed in the attacks, about 70 percent &#8211; at least 138 &#8211; were militants.  The remaining 56 were either civilians or tribal police,&#8221;...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/02/25/2660277/ap-impact-new-light-on-drone-wars.html">Associated Press reports</a>  that an &#8220;on-the-ground investigation&#8221; it conducted in North Waziristan of &#8220;10 of the deadliest [drone] attacks in the past 18 months&#8221;  found that  &#8220;of at least 194 people killed in the attacks, about 70 percent &#8211; at least 138 &#8211; were militants.  The remaining 56 were either civilians or tribal police,&#8221; based on interviews with local villagers, of whom &#8220;Many knew the dead civilians personally.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the report, &#8220;The U.S. has carried out at least 280 attacks since 2004 in Pakistan&#8217;s tribal region.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is curious about the AP report is its spin.  Sebastian Abbot&#8217;s story starts with the assertion that &#8220;American drone strikes inside Pakistan are killing far fewer civilians than many in the country are led to believe,&#8221; based on heated statements by Pakistani islamists that drone strikes &#8220;are killing nearly 100 percent innocent people&#8221; and so on.</p>
<p>In reality, the AP&#8217;s findings are <a href="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/">fully consistent with reporting by the respected Bureau of Investigative Journalism</a> which has found that the drone war in Pakistan has killed 464-818 civilians (including 175 children) out of  2,413-3,058 total deaths, a 15%-34% civilian fraction of the dead.  Note that the injured, maimed, widowed and orphaned are not counted among these victims.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/news/asia/Pakistan-Repeats-Condemnation-of-Drone-Strikes-138417439.html">President Obama recently caused a stir</a> with a public remark that &#8220;drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties.&#8221;  But they are killing thousands, and it appears that at least about a quarter of the victims are not among the &#8220;militants&#8221; being targeted.  In this light, it seems doubtful that &#8216;Really, it&#8217;s not as many dead kids as you think&#8217; is such a good talking point for proponents of so-called &#8220;targeted killing.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
